Legal Opinion
Hart v. Gallis
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 10, 1960No. 12763PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.
From a judgment for $6323.04 and costs, in favor of plaintiff George Hart, doing business as Hart Motor Express, entered against defendants James L. Gallis, James Chilis and Peter Chrisos, partners, doing business as Chicago Truck Terminal Service Station, they have appealed. Jurisdiction was based upon diversity of citizenship and the case was tried without a jury.
A cargo of eggs was shipped by a consignor from Wadena, Minnesota to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, via plaintiff, a common carrier by motor vehicle authorized to operate between points in the state of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Western Cottonoil Company v. J. C. Hodges and Mary WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Fargo Glass & Paint Co. v. Globe American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Arnolt Corp. v. Stansen Corp. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Ironworkers Local 86Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Pauline Apolskis v. Concord Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Laser Alignment, Inc., and Contractors Automated Devices, Inc. v. Woodruff & Sons, Inc., and Roy J. WoodruffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Jerry J. Hallberg, Etc. v. Charles W. HilburnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Hart v. GallisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.