Legal Opinion

Star Insurance Co. v. Neighbors

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2006No. 42926PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, J.:

In this case, we consider whether a workers’ compensation insurer may avoid payment of a claim submitted under retroactive coverage procured by employer fraud. We hold that the fraud in this instance voids the retroactive coverage from its inception and that NRS 616B.033, governing rights as between workers’ compensation insurers and the injured employees, does not negate a fraud *775defense as asserted by the insurer below. We also consider whether the worker in this case may claim benefits from the Uninsured Employers’ Claim Account (UECA) under NRS 616C.220, as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Banegas Ex Rel. Banegas v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. General Acc. Etc. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. United Security Insurance v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Construction Industry Workers' Compensation Group Ex Rel. Mojave Electric v. ChalueNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Matlock ex rel. Matlock v. HollisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of North Las Vegas v. WarburtonNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. G.C. Wallace, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. BUMA VS. PROVIDENCE CORP. DEV.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Bessinger v. R-N-M Builders & Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  5. CITY OF HENDERSON VS. SPANGLERNevada Supreme Court · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API