Legal Opinion

Hollister v. Ulvi

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 1937No. 31,140PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

This appeal is from an order overruling appellants’ general demurrer to respondents’ petition in a suit brought by them pursuant to the provisions of the declaratory judgments act, 3 Mason Minn. St. 1934, § 9455-1, et seq., the court having certified that the question presented thereby is important and doubtful. As a matter of convenience we shall hereafter refer to respondents as plaintiffs and to appellants as defendants.

Plaintiffs are attorneys and counselors at law actively engaged in their chosen profession. That is also true as to defendants Larson and Henning.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Winton v. AmosSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Wylie v. CoxeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. E. K. Buck Retail Stores v. HarkertNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hart v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Holt v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Brown v. Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie, M. B. H.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. Irwin v. Surdyk's LiquorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API