Legal Opinion

United States v. Saavedra

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 17, 2000No. Docket Nos. 99-1146, 99-1174PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge JOSÉ A. CABRANES dissents in a separate opinion.

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Marcelino Saavedra and Luis Rodriguez appeal from judgments of conviction entered on March 18 and March 24, 1999, respectively, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York after a jury trial before Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. Defendants were found guilty of conspiring to commit and attempting to commit an assault in aid of racketeering, both in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959(a)(6).

The question before us is where venue should lie for this criminal prosecution. Venue ordinarily…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. LombardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. CoplanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Richard A. Svoboda, Michael A. RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. RommyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. RoyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Silverio Ramirez and Angelica VitugCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API