Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1933No. 16211Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

In his motion for rehearing appellant says we overlooked the fact that he filed written objection to the charge because the court failed to instruct on aggravated assault. Such objection does appear from the record but the point was not urged or mentioned in the motion for new trial, nor briefed by appellant, hence we failed to discuss it in our original opinion.

Appellant now contends such instruction was called for under the following authorities: Stroud v. State, 24 S.W.2d 52; Miller v. State, 112 Tex.Crim. Rep., 13 S.W.2d 865; Shannon v. State, 36 S.W.2d 521; Dawson v. State,70 Tex. Crim.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Stroud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Colbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API