Legal Opinion

Stroud v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1929No. 12859PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Offense, murder; penalty, three years in the penitentiary.

The State introduced no eye-witnesses to the killing. An undertaker and the physician who attended deceased after the fatal difficulty were introduced as witnesses and by the physician a predicate was laid for the introduction of the dying declaration of deceased, which contains the chief incriminating facts relied on by the State for a conviction. From this we quote in part:

"After the election Stroud and I were reading the election returns and he said he would call his part of the bet off, and I told him no, we had the bet up. I told…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Poole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  3. Carlile v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Forest v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Merka v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matheson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Briscoe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Stroud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API