Stroud v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Offense, murder; penalty, three years in the penitentiary.
The State introduced no eye-witnesses to the killing. An undertaker and the physician who attended deceased after the fatal difficulty were introduced as witnesses and by the physician a predicate was laid for the introduction of the dying declaration of deceased, which contains the chief incriminating facts relied on by the State for a conviction. From this we quote in part:
"After the election Stroud and I were reading the election returns and he said he would call his part of the bet off, and I told him no, we had the bet up. I told…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Poole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Carlile v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Forest v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Merka v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matheson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Briscoe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Stroud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.