Legal Opinion
United Pacific/Reliance Insurance v. Kelley
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 30, 1980No. 1 CA-CIV 4337PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WREN, Judge.
The appellant, United Pacific/Reliance Insurance Company has appealed the denial of its Motion to Intervene as barred by the limitation of action set forth in A.R.S. § 12-542. We have determined that intervention should have been granted and therefore reverse.
The application to intervene was sought as a matter of right under 16 A.R.S., Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 24(a) 1 , in a lawsuit filed by plaintiffs, Arlo W. Jepson and Beverly Sue Jepson, his wife; Arlo Lawrence Jepson, a minor, by his father Arlo W. Jepson, on January 30, 1976, seeking damages from the estate of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. All American Bus Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co., Inc. v. All American Bus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Bryan v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Link Aviation, Inc. v. DownsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. McManisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. GasperColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. VargasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. Nelson (In Re Yakel)District Court, D. Arizona · 1989
- Max of Switzerland, Inc. v. Allright Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.