Legal Opinion

Troup Et Ux. v. N. Bethlehem Boro.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1936No. Appeal, 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadteeld, J.,

This is an appeal by the Borough of New Bethlehem from a judgment in favor of Arnold Troup and Velva Troup, his wife, on a verdict in an appeal from the award of a Board of Viewers in connection with the grading, paving and curbing of Wood Street in said borough.

Arnold Troup and Velva Troup, his wife, became the owners of a lot of land in the Borough of New Bethlehem in 1924, one of the boundaries of which named in their deed is the “west side of Wood Street,” which, before it was dedicated as a street in the municipality, was an established public road or turnpike…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caplan's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Fyfe v. Turtle Creek BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Borough of New Brighton v. United Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  4. O'Brien v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Anspach v. the City of AltoonaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCrady CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. MOYER Et Ux. v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Beimel v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Elk County1974
  4. Dorney Park Coaster Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1961
  5. McCrady CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API