Legal Opinion

Anspach v. the City of Altoona

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1931No. Appeal 214PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Plaintiff has judgment on a verdict for damages resulting from a change of grade of Twenty-second Avenue, on which his property abuts. The defendant is a third class city and denies , liability on the ground that the change of grade was from the natural surface of the street to the first grade established by the city.

We have found it necessary to examine the original record of the case, to supplement such parts as were printed. While Twenty-second Avenue is now a part of the City of Altoona, it was originally part of an adjoining township. The avenue is 50 feet wide between…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Borough of New Brighton v. United Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  2. O'Brien v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Groff v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Ellwood Lumber Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Klenke v. West Homestead BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MOYER Et Ux. v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Troup Et Ux. v. N. Bethlehem Boro.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API