Anspach v. the City of Altoona
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
Plaintiff has judgment on a verdict for damages resulting from a change of grade of Twenty-second Avenue, on which his property abuts. The defendant is a third class city and denies , liability on the ground that the change of grade was from the natural surface of the street to the first grade established by the city.
We have found it necessary to examine the original record of the case, to supplement such parts as were printed. While Twenty-second Avenue is now a part of the City of Altoona, it was originally part of an adjoining township. The avenue is 50 feet wide between…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Borough of New Brighton v. United Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- O'Brien v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Groff v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Ellwood Lumber Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Klenke v. West Homestead BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- MOYER Et Ux. v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Troup Et Ux. v. N. Bethlehem Boro.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936