B.T. Produce Co. v. Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record of the United States Department of Agriculture and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j).
For the reasons set forth in the attached memorandum, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Department of Agriculture be affirmed.
Pursuant to Rule 36 of this Court, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coosemans Specialties, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Kleiman & Hochberg, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007