Legal Opinion

Ossandon v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurray T. Feiden, J.

Motion for an order directing the defendant, by its motorman and conductor, to submit to an examination before trial and for the discovery and inspection of certain documents.

Defendant states that it has no objection to producing the motorman of the train allegedly involved in the accident who, it claims, is familiar with the facts concerning the operation of the train, but it objects to submitting the conductor on the ground that he has no knowledge. A corporation to be examined as an adverse party has the right to produce those witnesses having knowledge of the facts. The choice does not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Rizzuto v. TelescaNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Carden Hall, Inc. v. Riden Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In re the Estate of DanielsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  5. Shedrick v. Gary Land Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LukasNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
  2. In re EshagianNew York Surrogate's Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API