Legal Opinion

Tuck v. Town of Waldron

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from Scott Circuit Court. Hon. L. J. Joyner, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

English, Ch. J.:

On the 26th January, 1876, an affidavit was made before the mayor of Waldron, charging that W. L. Tuck “did sell ardent and vinous liquors inside the corporation of Waldron, without first having obtained license, as required by an ordinance adopted by the town council of said town.”

The defendant demurred to the charge ; the mayor overruled the demurrer, and the defendant, declining to answer further, was fined $25, and appealed to the Circuit Court, where the demurrer was renewed and overruled. The defendant was then tried by a jury, on the plea of not guilty; found guilty,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Burlington v. KellarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Harris v. Intendant & Council of LivingstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mernaugh v. City of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  2. Trammell v. Town of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  3. Cumnock v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. City of Stuttgart v. StraitSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  5. Marianna v. VincentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API