Legal Opinion
Patmon v. Michigan Supreme Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 1, 2000No. 98-2364PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorris, J., joined by Siler, J.,
JONES, J. (pp. 510-11), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Frederick A. Patmon, filed an action in district court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) against the Michigan Supreme Court, the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission, the Attorney Discipline Board, the State Bar of Michigan, and various officials affiliated with these entities in order to challenge his temporary suspension from the practice of law. Plaintiff alleged that the Michigan statutes and court rules governing the practice of law deprived him of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Peterson Novelties, Inc. And Harold Barman v. City of Berkley and Raymond AngerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Loriz v. ConnaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Coleman v. Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Elsman v. Standard Federal BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Hall v. CreechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.