Legal Opinion
Loriz v. Connaughton
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 11, 2007No. 06-3427UnpublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge.
The Petitioners-Appellants, Michael Hanning Loriz and Cara Francke Loriz, pro se, filed a civil rights complaint against 25 public and private sector individuals, alleging various violations of their constitutional rights. The district court granted the motions to dismiss and motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by some of the defendants, and dismissed, sua sponte, the remaining defendants. This timely appeal followed.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1995, the Lorizes purchased a 45-acre farm in Butler County, Ohio. On the farm, the Lorizes…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nathaniel Brent v. Wayne Cty. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Lawrence v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Hall v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Battah v. Resmae Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Embassy Realty Investment, LLC v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.