Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Baird
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1994No. 93-1226PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Andre T. Henderson brought this Bivens federal constitutional tort action1 alleging that the defendants, federal prison officials, violated a number of his constitutional rights by instituting and carrying out prison disciplinary proceedings against him. The defendants appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for qualified immunity on Henderson’s substantive due process and retaliation claims. We reverse and remand.
I
In early 1987, Henderson was incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution at Sandstone, Minnesota. On March 12, 1987, David Baird, a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Jerald Thomas v. Unknown EbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Joseph Watson v. Gerald RozumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Claude E. Woods v. Larry SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Proctor v. ApplegateDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Alsbrook v. City Of MaumelleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.