Legal Opinion

SEC v. Allen Smith

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided July 2, 2015No. 14-CV-192-PBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Securities and Exchange Commission v. Civil No. 14-cv-192-PB Opinion No.

2015 DNH 134

Allen R. Smith MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) claims in this securities fraud action that Allen Smith participated in an advance-fee investment fraud scheme in his capacity as an attorney and fiduciary. The SEC now moves for summary judgment and asks the court to impose injunctive relief, disgorgement, and a monetary civil penalty against Smith. Most of the SEC’s claims require proof of scienter, which…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. LBRY, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
  2. US Securities and Exchange Commission v. LBRY, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API