St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Kral
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Noble County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Wencel Krai against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, C. J.
This is a suit in damages ror personal injuries. It involves the doctrine of the last clear chance. There was judgment for plaintiff, and the company brings the case here. At the point where the injury occurred the section line road, along which plaintiff was traveling, and the railroad of the company converge at an angle of about 45 -degrees. The distance on a line from the edge of the company’s right of way to the center of its track is 50 feet, but following the meanderings of the dirt road, after it enters upon said right of way, the distance is 90 feet. On the day of the injury plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. BarkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by10 opinions
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Thrasher v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Chickasha St. Ry. Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Safeway Cab Service Co. v. MinorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.