Legal Opinion

Bourland v. Mosier

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 1924No. 13413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

The Acme Drilling Company, under contract, was drilling an oil and gas well for defendants in error near Okmulgee. Plaintiff in error, Bour-land, sued defendants in error for $352, for transporting a pumper, Hunt, to and from said well. Plaintiff alleged that one Bowser was the agent of defendants in charge of drilling and supervising said well and that said Bowser employed plaintiff to haul said Hunt at $4 per trip from the city of Ok-mulgee. Defendants, by verified answer, denied that they ever thus employed plaintiff, and denied the agency of Bowers to employ plaintiff.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thorp Oil & Specialty Co. v. Home Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Oklahoma Automobile Co. v. BennerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Reed v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whitney v. LowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Sand Springs Home v. Perin Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Commerce Trust Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Waken v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API