Legal Opinion
Dai v. American Curvet Investment CA2/5
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 2020No. B290504Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 12/29/20 Dai v. American Curvet Investment CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE PING DAI, B290504 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC620154) v. AMERICAN CURVET…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Miller v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Trejo v. Johnson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.