Legal Opinion
Petherbridge v. Altadena Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1974No. Civ. 12472PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KERRIGAN, Acting P. J.
— Marjorie A. Petherbridge (“Plaintiff” and “Appellant”) is a borrower of Prudential Savings and Loan Association (“Prudential”). The loan is secured by a deed of trust on real property located in the County of Orange. Under the provisions of her trust deed, plaintiff is required to pay monthly, in addition to principal and interest, a sum estimated by Prudential at 1/12 of the combined annual costs of taxes and insurance on the property. These supplemental payments are called “impounds.”
Plaintiff brought a class action upon behalf of herself and all…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Joseph B. KAUFFMAN Et Al. v. the DREYFUS FUND, INC., Et Al., Investors Diversified Services, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Caro v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Hogya v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Occidental Land, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.