Yaniv De Ridder, et al. v. Roblox Corporation, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA YANIV DE RIDDER, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04146-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT v. SAID’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ UCL AND COMMON ROBLOX CORPORATION, et al., LAW CLAIMS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 246 The California Penal Code contains several provisions that prohibit operating a game of chance in which the player can win or lose a “thing of value.” These provisions were drafted a long time ago, and they are very difficult to understand. The question presented here is whether a website that enables people to gamble away their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Harrott v. County of KingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Score Family Fun Center, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.