Legal Opinion

Yaniv De Ridder, et al. v. Roblox Corporation, et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 10, 2025No. 3:23-cv-04146Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA YANIV DE RIDDER, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04146-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT v. SAID’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ UCL AND COMMON ROBLOX CORPORATION, et al., LAW CLAIMS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 246 The California Penal Code contains several provisions that prohibit operating a game of chance in which the player can win or lose a “thing of value.” These provisions were drafted a long time ago, and they are very difficult to understand. The question presented here is whether a website that enables people to gamble away their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Harrott v. County of KingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Score Family Fun Center, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API