Legal Opinion
Harrott v. County of Kings
California Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2001No. S055064PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
Mr. Harrott is an attorney. He received a gun collection in payment for legal services rendered to clients who had pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property. The Kings County Sheriff’s Department, which was in possession of the gun collection, did not assert that one of the weapons, a semiautomatic rifle (the rifle), was stolen property, but nevertheless refused to deliver it to Mr. Harrott on the ground it was an assault weapon proscribed by the Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989 (Stats. 1989, ch. 19, § 3, p. 64; hereafter AWCA). Mr. Harrott brought this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Casterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Larkin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Governor Gray Davis Committee v. American Taxpayers AllianceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.