Legal Opinion

Looney v. Bingham Dairy

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1927No. 4537PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHansen, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants James Makrakis and Chris Fur-gis, in which judgment plaintiff recovered for a personal injury.

The plaintiff, in his complaint, alleges in substance that, the plaintiff is a minor and that May Jane Looney, his mother, is his guardian; that James Makrakis, Nick Mak-rakis, Chris Furgis, and Louis Furgis were at the time of the injury complained of engaged in conducting a dairy at Bingham, Utah, under the firm name of the Bingham Dairy; that the defendants maintained in the town of Bing-ham Canyon, Utah, a dairy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Konold v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Beatty v. ShellyUtah Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barnett v. La Mesa Post No. 282California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Jackson v. MateusUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Benke v. SteppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. McComas v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Pullan Ex Rel. Pullan v. SteinmetzUtah Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API