Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Monroe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 26, 1993No. 114, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

The propriety of a trial court’s order, entered at the mother’s behest, that the man who acknowledges paternity of a child born out of wedlock take a blood test to establish that paternity, is one of the issues presented in this case. The related issue, whether the results of the blood test properly were admitted into evidence and deemed to be dispositive of the acknowledged father’s custody claim, is also presented. Holding that it was reversible error to require the acknowledged father to submit to a blood test, the Court of Special Appeals reversed the judgment of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Marriage of RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  3. Ross v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Knill v. KnillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Koshko v. HainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Petrini v. PetriniCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. In Re Adoption No. A91-71ACourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Sider v. SiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API