Legal Opinion

Ross v. Hoffman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 25, 1977No. [No. 128, September Term, 1976.]PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

Once again the courts have been called upon to decide who shall have custody of a minor child. In such disputes it is

always the child who is not only the innocent victim, but who has the most at stake. Caught in the wake of marital discord, or adult indiscretion, or economic adversity, the well-being of the child, both present and future, is usually profoundly affected by the court’s resolution of the private dispute over who shall be entrusted with its care. In more primitive societies where the large kinship group is the basic societal unit, child custody problems are solved by leaving the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Bennett v. JeffreysNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Chapsky v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. In re BortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Ross v. PickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. North v. NorthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Maryland Metals, Inc. v. MetznerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Koshko v. HainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API