Legal Opinion

Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 4, 2011No. 10-15286, 10-16392PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Stephanie Enyart, a legally blind law school graduate, sought to take the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam and the Multistate Bar Exam using a computer equipped with assistive technology software known as JAWS and ZoomText. The State Bar of California had no problem with Enyart’s request but the National Conference of Bar Examiners refused to grant this particular accommodation. Enyart sued NCBE under the Americans with Disabilities Act seeking injunctive relief. The district court issued preliminary injunctions requiring NCBE to allow Enyart to take…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Earth Island Institute v. CarltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Farris v. SeabrookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API