Legal Opinion
Farris v. Seabrook
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 11, 2012No. 11-35620PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed January 19, 2012, and appearing at 667 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir.2012), is AMENDED. An amended opinion will be filed concurrently with this order.
With this action, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed February 9, 2012, is DENIED.
No further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Manuel De Jesus Ortega Melendr v. Joseph M. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Friends of the Wild Swan v. Chip WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Ah Quin v. County of Kauai Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Texans for Free Enterprise v. Texas Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.