Legal Opinion
Dubray v. Rosebud Housing Authority
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided May 6, 1983No. CIV82-3077PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOGUE, Chief Judge.
The Defendants in the above-entitled matter filed extensive motions to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The three named Plaintiffs in this case filed a Complaint against the Defendants arising out of the alleged wrongful discharge of the Plaintiffs from their positions of employment with the Rosebud Housing Authority (hereinafter RHA). The Defendants include the RHA, its managing director, and several members…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Weeks Construction, Inc. v. Oglala Sioux Housing Authority, United States of America, and Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Phillips v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In Re Phillips)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1991
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. US, BUR. OF INDIAN AFF.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1989
- United States v. SnowdenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
- Owens Valley Indian Housing Authority v. Gifford TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.