Minton v. Thomas
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGRAham, Presiding Judge
The appellants filed an application on June 9, 1925, for a patent on improvements “ in filter systems for loud speakers.” On July 12, 1927, a patent was issued to the appellee upon an invention re-*1154iating to loud speakers upon his application filed March 15, 1926. On October 12, 1927, the appellants filed an amendment in the Patent Office, in and by means of which they amended their specification so that the same would state one of the objects of the appellants’ alleged invention to be the same as that set forth in appellee’s said patent. In addition ,the appellants added claims 16 to 23,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Wickelman v. A. B. Dick Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- Beckwith v. Malleable Iron Range Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1910
- Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. Thompson Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1919
- General Electric Co. v. Sangamo Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- Application of William L. Tenney, Paul A. Frank and Scoville E. KnoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Raytheon Mfg. Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1940
- Application of William L. Tenney, Paul A. Frank and Scoville E. KnoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Winslow Palmer v. John T. McLamore Milton J. Minneman, and Ted E. DunnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955