Legal Opinion

Application of William L. Tenney, Paul A. Frank and Scoville E. Knox

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 23, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6327Published

1Opinion of the Court

254 F.2d 619

Application of William L. TENNEY, Paul A. Frank and Scoville E. Knox.

Patent Appeal No. 6327.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 23, 1958.

Lawrence B. Biebel and Marechal, Biebel, French & Bugg, Dayton, Ohio, for appellants.

Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D. C. (J. Schimmel, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Com'r of Patents.

Before JOHNSON, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL, WORLEY, and RICH, Judges.

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

1

This is an appeal from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, rejecting claims 3 through 12, 14 through 18, 21 and 22, all the claims…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API