Legal Opinion

Winslow Palmer v. John T. McLamore Milton J. Minneman, and Ted E. Dunn

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 30, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6071Published

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office granting priority of invention of the subject matter of the interference to the junior party, McLamore, Minneman, and Dunn, hereinafter referred to as McLamore. Three counts, Nos. 1, 5, and 6, corresponding to claims 1, 5, and 6 of the Mc-Lamore patent, were before the board in the interference, the interference having been dissolved by the Primary Examiner as to all other counts. Only counts 1 and 5 are involved here, no appeal having been taken as to count…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brill v. Third Ave. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
  2. Minton v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API