Legal Opinion

Blodow v. Pan Pacific Fisheries, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1954No. Civ. No. 20378Published

1Opinion of the Court

MOSK, J. pro tem.*

Appellant-plaintiff seeks reversal of an adverse judgment in an action brought in state court pursuant to provisions of the Jones Act (46 U.S.C.A. § 688).

The appellant’s first cause of action alleged that respondent employers failed to exercise ordinary care to provide him with a reasonably safe place to work in that they negligently caused and allowed an accumulation of a slick and oily foreign substance to be and to remain upon the surface of a hatch cover on the seagoing vessel involved herein, creating dangerous and insecure footing for appellant who was required to walk…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Cookingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Intagliata v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Hawn v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  5. Adams v. American President Lines, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API