Blodow v. Pan Pacific Fisheries, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MOSK, J. pro tem.*
Appellant-plaintiff seeks reversal of an adverse judgment in an action brought in state court pursuant to provisions of the Jones Act (46 U.S.C.A. § 688).
The appellant’s first cause of action alleged that respondent employers failed to exercise ordinary care to provide him with a reasonably safe place to work in that they negligently caused and allowed an accumulation of a slick and oily foreign substance to be and to remain upon the surface of a hatch cover on the seagoing vessel involved herein, creating dangerous and insecure footing for appellant who was required to walk…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Cookingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Intagliata v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Hawn v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Adams v. American President Lines, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.