Legal Opinion
Hawn v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 3, 1952No. 10630_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a civil action for personal injuries on a maritime claim. It resulted in a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff with special findings that the vessel was unseaworthy; that both the defendant bare-boat charterer and the third-party defendant employer were negligent; and that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence to the extent of 17%%. Following the disposal of post-trial motions, 99 F.Supp. 226, judgment was entered, 100 F.Supp. 338, in favdr of the plaintiff against the defendant in the amount of the verdict less 17%% and in favor of the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Crawford v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. Lucibello v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- George W. Dixon, Libelant-Appellee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Hugev v. Dampskisaktieselskabet InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
- Southport Transit Company v. Avondale Marine Ways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.