In Re Gibson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The case turns on the validity of the final decree entered in the Circuit Court of Florida on 13 July, 1942. If this decree be void, the petitioner and his wife are living in a state of separation, without being divorced, and habeas corpus will lie under C. S., 2241, to determine the custody of their minor child. But if this Florida decree be valid, the petition must fail, for as to divorced parents habeas corpus is not available to determine the custody of their children. In re Ogden, 211 N. C., 100, 189 S. E., 119, and cases there assembled.
We think theré was error in holding on the facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tompkins v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- McCormick v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- McIntyre v. . McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Ladd v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- In Re OgdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Weddington v. WeddingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Phipps v. . VannoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- In Re Custody of MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945