Legal Opinion

Bryson v. Collmer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1904No. 4,870PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From. Elkhart Circuit Court; J. D. Ferrall, Judge. Action by George F. Collmer, guardian, against Anna Z. Bryson and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, C. J.

In the suit of the appellee as guardian of Mary Hazel Himes, a minor, against the appellants, Anna Zeitler Bryson and her husband, Frederick G. Bryson, one Mary Zeitler also was made a party defendant. The court rendered a special finding, and the Brysons, husband and wife, have separately assigned that the court erred in its first conclusion of law. Mary Zeitler also assigned errors, but the appeal, so far as she is concerned, has heretofore been dismissed on her motion. It was specially found, that August 9, 1890, Mary Zeitler was the owner of certain land, described, in Elkhart county,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barnett v. HarshbargerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Martin v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Higgins v. KendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Barrett v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Nichols v. GloverIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. HersheyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Beard v. PayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Vanorman v. VanormanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Fidler v. Farmers & Traders BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Ewell v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API