Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MATHESON, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
When a neighborhood bookstore in Denver sells a book, it must collect sales tax from the buyer and remit that payment to the Colorado Department of Revenue (“Department”). When Barnes & Noble sells a book over the Internet to a Colorado buyer, it must collect sales tax from the buyer and remit. But when Amazon sells a book over the Internet to a Colorado buyer, it has no obligation to collect sales tax. This situation is largely the product of the Supreme Court’s decision in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298, 112 *1132S.Ct. 1904, 119 L.Ed.2d 91…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Wynne v. Comptroller of Md.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- State v. Wayfair Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Vickie Kansler v. Mississippi Department of RevenueMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
- JMCB, LLC v. Bd. of Commerce & Indus.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.