Legal Opinion

Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2016No. 12-1175PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHESON, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

When a neighborhood bookstore in Denver sells a book, it must collect sales tax from the buyer and remit that payment to the Colorado Department of Revenue (“Department”). When Barnes & Noble sells a book over the Internet to a Colorado buyer, it must collect sales tax from the buyer and remit. But when Amazon sells a book over the Internet to a Colorado buyer, it has no obligation to collect sales tax. This situation is largely the product of the Supreme Court’s decision in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298, 112 *1132S.Ct. 1904, 119 L.Ed.2d 91…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Wynne v. Comptroller of Md.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. State v. Wayfair Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Vickie Kansler v. Mississippi Department of RevenueMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  5. JMCB, LLC v. Bd. of Commerce & Indus.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API