Legal Opinion

Superior Improvement Co. v. Hignight

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 30, 1973No. 73-8PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Appellee-claimant asserted that she suffered a compensable fall in the course of her employment and was sustained by a unanimous commission and the circuit court. Appellant here contends that the finding that claimant suffered a fall on appellant’s premises is not supported by substantial evidence; that if she did suffer such an occurrence it was not the cause of claimant’s injuries; and that error was committed in not finding that the healing period ended on or about September 1, 1971.

Appellee, a sixty year old widow, was a telephone…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCollum v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. Oak Lawn Farms v. PayneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Allied Telephone Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Harris v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Barksdale Lumber Co. v. McAnallySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Purdy v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Clark v. Shiloh Tank & Erection Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API