Purdy v. Livingston
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
This appeal in a workmen’s compensation case turns upon the question whether there was substantial evidence to support the commission’s finding that appellee Livingston was an employee (but not a casual one) of appellant Purdy when he was injured in a fall from a ladder. We find that there was and affirm.
Livingston was employed by Village Mall, Inc. to keep a public or mall area clean. He was free to enter into arrangements with tenants of the corporation, such as appellant, to do work for them which did not interfere with his employment. He entered into an agreement…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Aluminum Co. of America v. HenningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Elm Springs Canning Co. v. SullinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Eddington v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Silvicraft, Inc. v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Bunny Bread v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Liggett Construction Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- O. K. Processing, Inc. v. ServoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.