Legal Opinion

Anania v. Daubenspeck Chiropractic

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1998No. 97-CA-126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

In this case, plaintiffs-appellants, Roxanne Anania and Heather Ault, appeal from a decision of the Clark County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment to defendants-appellees, G.T. Daubenspeck, D.C., Inc. and Dr. George T. Daubenspeck, D.C. (collectively, “Daubenspeck”).

In their complaint, Anania and Ault alleged that while employed with Daubenspeck’s chiropractic clinic, they were subjected to sexually harassing conduct from the clinic’s patients. They further alleged that they complained to Daubenspeck about this conduct but that Daubenspeck refused to take corrective…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Little Forest Medical Center v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gates Mills Investment Co. v. Village of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Magnuson v. Peak Technical Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  5. Richard GARZIANO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hooten v. Safe Auto InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Burgin v. EatonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. OneWest Bank, FSB v. Carol StonerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API