Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1987No. 87-179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has certified to this court, pursuant to D.C. Code § 11-723 (1987 Supp.), 1 the following question of law: “Does a provision in a life insurance policy that covers any ‘passenger ... riding in or getting ... off’ a vehicle of a common carrier embrace a person who has disembarked from the vehicle, but has not reached a zone of safety?” Edwards v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., No. 86-5238 (D.C.Cir. Feb. 20, 1987) (order certifying question of »law to District of Columbia Court of Appeals). We hold that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. LudwigSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Whitmire v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  3. Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Carta v. Providence Washington Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. FromerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Railco Multi-Construction Co. v. GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Georgetown University v. Sportec International, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Claree Edwards v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API