Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Ludwig
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
This is a diversity case. Petitioner (the insurer) issued a life insurance policy in Michigan to Dean E. Cane providing for double indemnity if Cane's “death was the result of an injury sustained while the insured was a passenger in or upon a public conveyance then being operated by a common carrier to transport passengers for hire ....'' Cane was killed in Illinois by a freight train while crossing a railroad track in order to board a commuter train which had not yet arrived at the station. The insurer paid Cane's estate ordinary benefits, but denied liability under the double indemnity…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Benno P. Ludwig, as Administrator of the Estate of Dean E. Cane, Deceased v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
3Cited by190 opinions
- Fischer-Ross v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Jenkins v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jenkins v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Dion Strong v. Alphonso DavidCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.