Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Ludwig

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 14, 1976No. 75-1504PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a diversity case. Petitioner (the insurer) issued a life insurance policy in Michigan to Dean E. Cane providing for double indemnity if Cane's “death was the result of an injury sustained while the insured was a passenger in or upon a public conveyance then being operated by a common carrier to transport passengers for hire ....'' Cane was killed in Illinois by a freight train while crossing a railroad track in order to board a commuter train which had not yet arrived at the station. The insurer paid Cane's estate ordinary benefits, but denied liability under the double indemnity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Benno P. Ludwig, as Administrator of the Estate of Dean E. Cane, Deceased v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. Fischer-Ross v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Jenkins v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Jenkins v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Dion Strong v. Alphonso DavidCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API