Legal Opinion
Jed Lineberry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 15, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-2056PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s [sic] Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # ll]. 1 For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
TRULINCS is the system by which prisoners in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) may correspond electronically and in writing with the public. See generally Mem. in Supp. of Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss (“Defs.’ Mem.”), Attach. B (Program Statement P5265.13, Trust Fund Limited Inmate Computer System (TRULINCS) — Electronic Messaging (Feb. 19, 2009)) (hereinafter “Program…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Scruggs v. Bureau of Engraving & PrintingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Scott v. ConleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Barroca v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Barroca v. SamuelsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Davis v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.