Legal Opinion

Ridgley, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1986No. 86-260PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether a municipality is preempted by operation of state law from regulating, pursuant to the authority of local zoning ordinances, the retail sale of alcoholic beverages within that municipality. We answer in the negative.

Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution, known as the home rule provision, provides:

“Municipalities shall have authority to exercise all powers of local self-government and to adopt and enforce within their limits such local police, *359sanitary and other similar regulations, as are not in conflict with general laws.”

Thus, a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Westlake v. Mascot Petroleum Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Joe Horisk's Salvage Pool Systems v. City of StrongsvilleOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Mominee v. ScherbarthOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Stumpf v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Westlake v. Mascot PetroleumOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API