Legal Opinion

City of Westlake v. Mascot Petroleum Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1991No. 90-1090PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

I

The threshold issue submitted for our review concerns the procedural foundation necessary to maintain the present challenge to the Westlake municipal ordinance through the declaratory judgment mechanism. The instant action is governed by R.C. 2721.12, which provides:

“When declaratory relief is sought, all persons shall be made parties ^who have or claim any interest which would be affected by the declaration. No declaration shall prejudice the rights of persons not parties to the proceeding. In any proceeding which involves the validity of a municipal ordinance or franchise, the municipal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malloy v. City of WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Sebastiani v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ridgley, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ohio Ass'n of Private Detective Agencies, Inc. v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ohioans for Fair Representation, Inc. v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Midwest Retailer Associated, Ltd. v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
  5. BP Oil Co. v. City of Dayton Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API