Legal Opinion
Wertz v. Chapman Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 20, 1998PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAHERTY, Judge.
Sherry Wertz appeals from the orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Clinton County (trial court) which (1) denied her motion for a jury trial of her sexual discrimination suit pursuant to the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA)1 and (2) found in favor of Chapman Township, Chapman Township Supervisors, and Supervisors Robert Walizer, Dean Scott and Robert Young (defendants).2 We vacate in part and affirm in part.
The questions presented on appeal are (1) whether the trial court erred by excluding certain evidence, (2) whether the trial judge exhibited a bias in favor of…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Mishoe v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Schouten v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Com. v. J. Irland Smith and Wesson 9MM Semi-Automatic Pistol, Serial PDW0493Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Wilkinsburg Penn Joint Water AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.