Legal Opinion
John Hemphill v. Harold Schott, Nyc Police Officer Thomas Dimuro, Nyc Police Officer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 10, 1998No. Docket 96-2793PublishedCited by 162 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge:
John Hemphill appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Lewis A.
Kaplan, Judge, granting summary judgment to Defendants Harold Schott and Thomas DiMuro, New York City police officers [“the Officers”], in a suit Hemphill brought against them under section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871,42 U.S.C. § 1983. Acting pro se, Hemphill sued Officers Schott and DiMuro, and others, alleging that they violated his right under the United States Constitution not to be subjected to excessive force when Officer Schott shot…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by162 opinions
- Doe Ex Rel. Magee v. Covington County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Thomas v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Frost v. New York City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Okin v. Village of Cornwall-On-Hudson Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Thomas v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.