Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Askew

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 6, 2007No. 04-3092PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH, in which Circuit Judge SENTELLE joins.

Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS.

KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge.

When the police have reasonable suspicion that a person committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime, the officers may forcibly stop that individual. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). During the Terry stop, the officers may briefly take certain reasonable investigative steps — including questioning the suspect and conducting identification procedures such as…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Proctor, DouglasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. AskewCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  4. Henke v. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. United States v. AskewCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API