United States v. Askew
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Concurrence
GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges ROGERS and TATEL join except as to footnote 2,
concurring:
I agree that police officers violated Paul Askew’s Fourth Amendment rights and so join the majority opinion in almost every respect. Given the importance of this appeal, I write separately to clarify my rationale for rejecting the government’s principal argument before the en banc court. Hayes v. Florida noted in dicta that a brief detention for the purpose of fingerprinting a suspect is not necessarily an unconstitutional seizure. 470 U.S. 811, 816-17, 105 S.Ct. 1643, 84 L.Ed.2d 705…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.