Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Askew

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 12, 2007No. 04-3092Published

1Concurrence

GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges ROGERS and TATEL join except as to footnote 2,

concurring:

I agree that police officers violated Paul Askew’s Fourth Amendment rights and so join the majority opinion in almost every respect. Given the importance of this appeal, I write separately to clarify my rationale for rejecting the government’s principal argument before the en banc court. Hayes v. Florida noted in dicta that a brief detention for the purpose of fingerprinting a suspect is not necessarily an unconstitutional seizure. 470 U.S. 811, 816-17, 105 S.Ct. 1643, 84 L.Ed.2d 705…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API