Legal Opinion

Wohlsen/Crow v. Pettinato Associated Contractors & Engineers, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1995No. 3339PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

In this appeal we are called upon to review an order issued pursuant to Rule 213.1 of Pennsylvania’s Rules of Civil Procedure, governing coordination of actions in different counties. Pa.R.C.P. 213.1. For the reasons that follow we affirm in part and vacate in part.

The action underlying this appeal arose from a contract dispute involving the construction of a 1000-bed medium security prison to be located in Schuylkill County. Appellant Wohlsen/Crow, A Joint Venture (“Wohlsen/Crow”) entered into a contract with the Redevelopment Authority of Schuylkill County to build the prison.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lincoln General Insurance v. DonahueCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Washington v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Abrams v. UchitelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Pennsylvania State UniversitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Trumbauer v. GodshallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Bingham v. Poswistilo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API