Legal Opinion
Swineford v. Nichols
Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas
Decided May 10, 1961No. 34921PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLamneck, J.
Each plaintiff in this action is the owner or a part owner of a lot in the H. G. Holderbaum’s First Allotment to the City of Dover, Ohio. They seek a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from the operation of a beauty parlor on Lot number 3822 in said allotment.
It' appears from the undisputed evidence in this case that said Lot No. 3822 is a part of said H. G. Holderbaum’s First Allotment to the City of Dover, Ohio, which was taken into the corporate limits of said city on September 4, 1956. The allotment contains approximately forty one city lots. The defend*495ants purchased said lot…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Morrow v. HasselmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Wood v. BlanckeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Smith v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Briggs v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sissel v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Biagini v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970